
The immediate backdrop is the ongoing March 2026 US–Israel coordinated military campaign against Iran, a series of strikes on Iranian power plants, air-defence systems and military infrastructure that US and Israeli officials said began in early March; Iranian military actions throughout 2026 have been framed by Tehran as responses to that campaign.
Those operations sit atop a structural framework shaped by international agreements and sanctions: the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the US announcement withdrawing from the JCPOA in May 2018 under President Donald Trump, and the subsequent stepped-up US and allied sanctions from 2019 through 2024 that sought to choke Iranian oil exports and restrict financial flows.
BRICS leaders gathered in Delhi under Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi as Iran's missiles and drones struck the United Arab Emirates, a development that pushed Tehran into the center of summit discussions and revealed sharp disagreements among member states.
The meeting included Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, and ministers and presidents debated whether BRICS should take a more confrontational posture toward U.S. and Western European influence or preserve a nonaligned, trade-focused identity.
Modi framed the bloc as neutral, saying the group is 'not against anyone,' a line intended to steady fractious talks but one that also signals India's desire to avoid choosing sides publicly.
Some delegations argued that BRICS should leverage its growing economic weight to challenge Western-dominated institutions, while others pushed back, worried that overtly antagonistic moves would derail cooperation on trade and development (per BBC).
The arrival of Iran's president at a summit coinciding with attacks on the UAE forced members to weigh security and diplomatic risks alongside the group's stated economic agenda, injecting a live geopolitical crisis into discussions that had been framed around expansion and reform of global governance (per BBC).
For now, the summit highlighted a practical gap: members agree on the need for greater influence, but disagree on whether that requires confronting the West or remaining issue-neutral to protect economic and diplomatic ties.
The immediate outcome was not a unified policy shift but visible divisions that diplomatic delegations will have to manage as regional hostilities shape member calculations (per BBC).
Whether BRICS members formally endorse any statement on the Iran-UAE strikes at follow-up meetings within 30 days (per BBC context of ongoing summit discussions). 2) Whether India uses upcoming BRICS working sessions to advance a nonaligned framing or to push a more confrontational posture toward Western institutions (per BBC reporting on internal divisions). 3) Whether Iran pursues further diplomatic engagement inside BRICS forums after the summit to translate its visibility into concrete support or policy language (per BBC noting Tehran's presence at the meeting).