Updat3
Search
Sign in
🔍

Jim and his wife thought it had to be a mistake.

Topic: generalRegion: asia pacificUpdated: i1 outletsSources: 2Spectrum: Left Only⏱ 4 min read⚠ 3d+ old
📰 Scored from 1 outletsacross 1 Left How we score bias →
Story Summary
SITUATION
Jim and his wife were shocked to learn their surrogate had given birth unexpectedly. They had anticipated receiving a text when their surrogate was admitted to the hospital, but instead received an email indicating their baby was already born in Georgia, not Russia as planned.
Coveragetap to expand ▾
Spectrum: Left Only🌍Asia: 1
Political Spectrum
Position is inferred from coverage mix.
i1 outlets · Center
Left
Center
Right
Left: 1
Center: 0
Right: 0
Geography Coverage
Distribution of where coverage is coming from.
i1 unique outlets · Dominant: Asia
All1Asia1 · 100%
KEY FACTS
  • Baby broker: The ‘crazy car salesman’ brokering babies and holding embryos ‘hostage’ Baby broker: The ‘crazy car salesman’ brokering babies and holding embryos ‘hostage’ Jim and his wife thought it had to be a mistake.
  • They were supposed to receive a text when their surrogate was admitted to the hospital.
  • Moreover, their baby was due to be born in Russia.
  • He soon received an email from censured Melbourne lawyer Paul Norris-Ongso, whom he had paid $150,000 for his company Global Surrogacy’s services.
  • “As you have heard by now, there is a good chance your baby is on the way,” Norris-Ongso wrote, attaching additional invoices, but seemingly unaware of the text telling them the birth had already taken place.
  • Melinda McCann had insisted she wanted an ethical surrogacy experience.
  • After two months of being stranded in Colombia, Melinda and Gail McCann could return home with their baby, Alexis.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT

The story of Jim and his wife, who found themselves embroiled in a surrogacy controversy, is a poignant illustration of the complex and often opaque world of international surrogacy arrangements.

Their experience, marked by confusion and distress, underscores the broader challenges faced by many in navigating the legal and ethical minefields of surrogacy, particularly when it involves cross-border elements.

Brief

Jim and his wife were left in disbelief after they learned that their surrogate, Maia, had given birth unexpectedly in Georgia, three months ahead of schedule. They had been under the impression that their son was still on the way and were awaiting a text notification when their surrogate was admitted to the hospital.

Instead, they received an email from Paul Norris-Ongso, a Melbourne lawyer, who had been paid $150,000 for his services through Global Surrogacy. The email indicated that their baby was already born, attaching additional invoices without acknowledging the premature birth.

Jim's reaction was one of confusion and shock, as he stated, '[We thought], it’s not our son.' The couple had planned for their child to be born in Russia, highlighting the unexpected nature of the situation. This incident raises questions about the communication and processes involved in surrogacy arrangements, particularly when international elements are involved.

As surrogacy continues to grow in complexity and popularity, cases like Jim's underscore the need for clearer protocols and better communication between all parties involved.

Sources
1 of 1 linked articles
Jim and his wife thought it had to be a mistake.
smh.com.auMay 23Center
↗
Updat3© 2026 Updat3. News Without the Noise.
MethodologyBias ScoringSourcesAboutBookmarksPricingPrivacyTerms
⌂Feed↑Trending⊕Global◇Saved