"It's complicated," she said of their relationship.
Coveragetap to expand ▾Spectrum: Mostly Center🌍Other: 2 · US: 1
- Stefon Diggs' former personal chef broke down into tears recounting the moment the ex-Patriots star allegedly choked her at his multimillion dollar mansion as the wide receiver's assault trial got underway Monday.
- digs from July through December 2025, also claimed the two had slept together before she was hired, making $2,000 a week.
- "It started out as friends, became sexual and we would meet up, hang out and we decided I would come work for him in February 2025," she testified.
- 2, 2025 — the day of the alleged assault — she texted Diggs from her bedroom in his house about how she was upset he wasn't taking her with him and others to Miami for the Art Basel expo.
- At one point in the text exchange, Diggs called her "b—hes," she claimed.
According to Adams, the incident occurred on February 2, 2025, when she claims Diggs choked her during a confrontation. Adams, who worked as a live-in chef for Diggs from July to December 2025, testified that their relationship was complex, involving both professional and personal elements.
She revealed that they had a sexual relationship before she was hired, which later evolved into a professional arrangement where she earned $2,000 weekly. The alleged assault was reportedly triggered by a disagreement over a trip to Miami for the Art Basel expo. Adams expressed her disappointment via text messages to Diggs, feeling excluded from the trip.
During this exchange, Diggs allegedly used derogatory language towards her, further escalating the situation. The trial has garnered attention due to the high-profile nature of the accused and the personal dynamics involved. Adams' testimony painted a picture of a tumultuous relationship that blurred the lines between personal and professional boundaries.
As the trial progresses, the court will examine the evidence presented by both parties. Diggs has not publicly commented on the allegations, and his legal team is expected to challenge Adams' claims.
This case highlights the complexities that can arise when personal relationships intersect with professional ones, particularly in high-stakes environments involving public figures. The outcome of the trial could have significant implications for both parties involved, as well as for public perceptions of personal conduct in professional settings.
Left- and right-leaning outlets are covering this story differently — in which facts to emphasize, which context to include, and how to frame causes and consequences.