
The immediate backdrop is the wider regional war that intensified after March 2026, when the United States and Israel carried out coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear‑adjacent facilities, air defenses and military infrastructure following a wave of Iranian missile and drone strikes against US and allied positions that month.
Those 2026 exchanges came after years of escalating tit‑for‑tat military and proxy actions across the Middle East, and they intersect with longstanding political debates in North America over the origins and responsibility for regional violence going back decades.
Hushang Manuchehri and Walter E. Block published a Washington Examiner opinion arguing that a widespread narrative—that the pre‑1948 Middle East was an interfaith paradise—improperly pins the root cause of October 7 violence on Israeli statehood.
The column names Benjamin Netanyahu as a target of journalistic blame for the October 7 events and contrasts that focus with what the authors describe as overlooked abuses elsewhere in the region, notably citing Iran’s repression, including killings over seemingly minor public acts such as honking horns (per Washington Examiner).
The writers frame 'progressives' as sympathetic to the paradise narrative and as willing to locate primary culpability for recent violence in Israel’s founding rather than in other authoritarian practices they say persist across the region (per Washington Examiner).
The piece advances an argument about competing historical narratives rather than offering new empirical evidence: it disputes the romanticized reconstruction of pre‑1948 communal relations and urges readers to weigh contemporaneous state abuses when assigning blame for recent outbreaks of violence (per Washington Examiner).
The column does not provide independent casualty counts, primary-source archival documentation of pre‑1948 intercommunal relations, nor engagement with scholarship that supports the 'paradise' interpretation; instead it presents a polemical corrective aimed at shifting responsibility away from Israeli policy debates and toward broader regional governance failures (per Washington Examiner).
Readers should treat the column as an opinion piece asserting that selective historical framing influences who is blamed for modern violence and that critics who single out Netanyahu risk overlooking other actors the authors say commit grave abuses (per Washington Examiner).