Trump seeks to halt payment to E. Jean Carroll in hope of eventual Supreme Court win
Coveragetap to expand ▾Spectrum: Mixed🌍Other: 3 · US: 1 · Asia: 1
- Trump insists he has absolute immunity from a lawsuit stemming from statements he made while he was US president.
- US President Donald Trump’s lawyer, hoping for an eventual Supreme Court victory, has asked a federal appeal court in New York to temporarily block a long-time columnist from collecting a US$83 million defamation award.
- Smith, told the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in a filing on Tuesday to stay its decision supporting the award so that Trump will not have to pay writer E.
- Trump has vehemently denied sexually abusing Carroll or ever knowing her and has repeatedly accused her of making accusations against him for political purposes or to promote her memoir.
- Presidential immunity is coming back to SCOTUS in Trump’s E. Jean Carroll appeal - MS NOW
- Presidential immunity is coming back to SCOTUS in Trump’s E.
Donald Trump has formally requested a stay on the $83 million judgment awarded to E. Jean Carroll, as he awaits a Supreme Court decision on the scope of presidential immunity. This legal maneuver is part of Trump's broader strategy to challenge the legal repercussions of his actions while in office.
Carroll's lawsuit, which accuses Trump of defamation and sexual assault, resulted in a significant financial judgment against the former president. Trump's legal team contends that the case presents critical constitutional questions regarding the extent of immunity that should be afforded to a former president.
The Supreme Court's decision on this matter could have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing how future cases involving former presidents are adjudicated. This request for a stay underscores the ongoing legal battles that Trump faces, as he navigates multiple lawsuits stemming from his time in office.
The outcome of this case will be closely watched, as it may establish new legal precedents concerning the accountability of former presidents. As the Supreme Court deliberates, both Trump's legal team and Carroll's representatives are preparing for the potential ramifications of the court's decision.
Left- and right-leaning outlets are covering this story differently — in which facts to emphasize, which context to include, and how to frame causes and consequences.