White House withdraws Lance Schroyer nomination for ICE after Sen. Rand Paul blocks hearing over civilian deaths
Coveragetap to expand ▾Spectrum: Mixed🌍US: 3
- The White House withdrew its nomination of Lance Schroyer to lead U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
- Lance Schroyer is a former Oklahoma state trooper and has little experience in immigration.
- Schroyer is close to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, a former U.S. senator from Oklahoma.
- Sen. Rand Paul refused to hold a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Schroyer until DHS provided information on civilian deaths during ICE enforcement operations.
- The White House withdrew Lance Schroyer’s nomination to lead Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Thursday.
- The withdrawal ensures ICE will remain without a Senate-confirmed leader for at least a while longer.
- Critics have questioned how ICE has recruited and trained officers as it raced to hire thousands for enforcement operations.
- ICE officers have shot and killed multiple people, including two American citizens in Minneapolis earlier this year.
The White House has withdrawn Lance Schroyer’s nomination to lead Immigration and Customs Enforcement after Sen. Rand Paul blocked the nomination in committee, the Washington Examiner reported. The move leaves the ICE director post without a confirmed nominee and transfers the political fight back to the Trump administration and congressional Republicans.
Schroyer, a former Oklahoma police officer whom President Donald Trump nominated in late June, had been serving as an adviser and on the security detail for Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, according to the Examiner.
Senate opposition coalesced when Rand Paul used his committee leverage to block Schroyer, prompting the White House decision to rescind the nomination rather than pursue a protracted confirmation fight.
The White House did not present an alternate nominee in the report, and the immediate consequence is continued leadership uncertainty at ICE as enforcement priorities remain under the authority of acting officials.
The episode underscores intraparty divisions within the Republican coalition over immigration appointments and oversight: the nomination was backed by the White House but faltered when a single senator in committee withheld support.
If the White House intends to renominate another candidate, it will need to navigate committee gatekeeping and the preferences of key Senate Republicans; if it does not, ICE will operate without a Senate-confirmed director for the foreseeable future (per Washington Examiner).
Left- and right-leaning outlets are covering this story differently — in which facts to emphasize, which context to include, and how to frame causes and consequences.

