
The immediate backdrop is a prolonged U.S.–China technology and trade confrontation that has intensified since 2018: the United States imposed broad tariffs on Chinese goods under its Section 301 investigation beginning in 2018 and placed high-profile Chinese firms such as Huawei on an export-control “entity list” in May 2019, while U.S. policy makers expanded chip-related export restrictions through 2020–2023 and Congress enacted the CHIPS and Science Act on August 9, 2022 to strengthen domestic semiconductor production.
China responded to these measures with targeted industrial and financial policies and with outbound investment programs designed to secure supply chains and enlarge domestic capacity in advanced manufacturing.
China is rapidly expanding industrial-scale production in electric vehicles, batteries, solar panels and semiconductors even as trading partners deploy tariffs and export controls.
The analysis published by scmp.com documents that Beijing’s manufacturers have moved beyond early-stage experiments into mass production of mature clean-energy and chip technologies, and that those industrial gains have continued despite external trade restrictions.
Chinese firms and factories are increasing output in sectors that were once considered vulnerable to curbs, and the piece contends that policy measures aimed at restricting trade flows have not stopped the on-the-ground buildout of capacity.
The report frames this shift as a change in the core axis of competition: rather than primarily fighting over market access and tariff lines, governments and companies will now compete over who can physically supply the next waves of industrial growth across Asia, Africa and Latin America.
The scmp.com analysis does not present granular company-level data in this brief excerpt, but it emphasizes a strategic consequence — that production scale, logistics and financing will determine winners more than tariff schedules.
Policymakers in importing markets face a decision: escalate trade measures or pivot to investments and industrial policy that bolster alternative suppliers. The article asks which governments or firms will fill demand in developing markets and suggests the outcome will shape how effective export controls and tariffs remain as industrial-policy tools.